Airline under fire for “interview fee”

A European airline is facing backlash after it was revealed bosses had begun charging candidates €60 ($100) to attend an interview.

Airline under fire for “interview fee”
HR professionals looking to make a quick buck might want to follow in the flight path of one European airline but be warned, shallow pockets might be a prerequisite too.

Air Europa Express has been denounced by a major trade union after it was revealed the company had been charging candidates €60 – approximately $100 – per interview.

Critics have expressed concern that the Spanish budget airline is simply cashing-in on the country’s unemployment rate, which currently sits at 21 per cent.

Approximately 2,000 applicants applied for just 100 pilot positions and 150 cabin crew positions, meaning the firm could have made €120,000 – in excess of $202,000 – if it interviewed every one.

Union spokesperson Isaac Valero told the Telegraph that the charge could be a signifier of even worse to come.
“If they asked for €60 this time, what may they charge the next time?” he asked.

“Faced with an ever moreprecarious labour market, with over 20 per cent of the active population out of work, this is clearly a disgraceful and abusive new measure which only contributes to making it harder for people to access employment.”

More like this:

Almost 80 per cent of bosses breaking the law

MI5 takes surprising top spot in LGBT study 

One way to improve staff retention rates 
 

Free newsletter

Our daily newsletter is FREE and keeps you up-to-date with the world of HR. Please complete the form below and click on subscribe for daily newsletters from HRD Canada.

Recent articles & video

What's the key to achieving workplace happiness?

This type of employee struggles to befriend their colleagues

Will 'virtual' mental health care save your staff?

HR on set? TV network revamps HR policy

Most Read Articles

How does harassment impact workplace culture?

Should HR encourage exercise at work?

Supreme Court rules independent contractor was an employee