How to break employees' bad habits in remote work

Is it time for HR to develop remote work etiquette for staff?

How to break employees' bad habits in remote work

After doing it for over two years, employees across the world have now grown used to working from home because of the pandemic - but a study from Shinesty has revealed that some may have grown too accustomed to the new work arrangement.

Shinesty attempted to dig deeper on what makes remote work so attractive to many workers that push them to resist return-to-office plans from employers. In its research, the company discovered some interesting habits, hygiene, and routines that may not be considered good at all in the typical workplace.

In its study, Shinesty found that:

  • 73% make excuses to avoid using video because they weren’t groomed or dressed properly
  • 66% admit to working from the toilet at some point when working from home, while a shocking 12% admit to working from the toilet every single day
  • 65% admit to taking a nap during working hours at some point during the week
  • 57% said they have missed meetings or calls due to taking a nap during working hours
  • 53% said they go straight to their desk "somewhat often" or even more frequently than that without brushing their teeth
  • 10% said they work naked or partially naked every single day, while another 55% admit to wearing just their underwear while working

HRD caught up with Shinesty chief executive officer Chris White to discuss these findings, where he warned that such bad habits could impose problems if they start to impact productivity and the ability of employees to get tasks done.

"One of the important aspects to remember about work, and work from home, is that getting your work done and doing it well is still paramount. We've seen throughout the past two years that working from home can be successful, if employees remain attentive and productive," White told HRD in a statement.

"If these bad habits start to impact productivity and employees’ ability to get their tasks done, then problems may arise."

In addition, some of the behaviours admitted to by employees could also be taken as "offensive" by employers.

"Respect in the workplace is huge, especially to create a great culture. So, bad habits like not being properly dressed can oftentimes be seen as offensive and no employer would ever want issues to arise because of that."

Read more: Remote working: How to establish a continued sense of belonging

Remote work etiquette?

With these behaviours unveiled, White told HRD that it might high time for HR to come up with guidelines for remote workers to ensure that workers refrain from developing bad habits.

"We feel that HR can set expectations for at-home/remote workers. Perhaps, now that more people than ever are permanently at-home workers, HR departments across the country need to establish more clear guidelines for at-home etiquette for all employees, much like they've had for years for in-office workers," the CEO said.

According to White, making policies clear and available for employees is "the best place to start."

"But it's important to remember not to go overboard and try to control every part of the day for at-home workers, when we all know that freedom and flexibility is very important to those workers," he said.

After all, remote work arrangement remains new for a lot of companies that clear guidelines may not have been set before the world was turned upside down by the pandemic.

"Communication is the key. Establish guidelines for your employees and communicate openly – we think that is key," White said.

Recent articles & video

A culture of adaptability: Leading through turbulence with nimble adaptability

Video: Harnessing organizational values to influence employee perks, retirement planning

Over 200,000 small employers took on new debt to repay CEBA loans: report

How to do a good job with exit interviews

Most Read Articles

RCMP called after suspected employee fraud in federal government

Province introducing paid sick leave as of Oct. 1

Lecturer fired for misogynistic paper published in his name