Opinion: How an intoxicated manager abused his colleagues... then won an unfair dismissal case

An employment lawyer outlines the lessons to be learned from a case that saw an abusive and intoxicated employee win an unfair dismissal claim.

Opinion:  How an intoxicated manager abused his colleagues... then won an unfair dismissal case
While office festivities are a time for everyone to let their hair down, employment lawyer Martin Alden warns about the obligations all employers hold to ensure these events remain fun for all to enjoy.

Now is the time of year when many businesses are about to hold their annual work Christmas party. While such events are intended to be enjoyed, they can quickly get out of hand and pose a risk to staff and the business. In a case before the Fair Work Commission earlier this year, an employee who became intoxicated at his work Christmas party and then swore at and sexually harassed a number of co-workers was found to have been unfairly dismissed by his employer. This case serves as a timely reminder for employers of the need to take precautions to properly protect their staff and business from inappropriate behaviour at their end of year celebration.


In the case of Keenan v Leighton Boral Amey Joint Venture [2015] FWC 3156, a Team Leader for the Leighton Boral Amey Joint Venture attended the annual work Christmas party. It was reported that the Team Leader consumed a total of 13 drinks on the night, including 2 beers before he arrived at the party and a vodka and coke after the party at a public par attached to the same venue.

During the function the Team Leader told a Director to “f-ck off” when he attempted to join a conversation, made the same comment to a Senior Project Manager, asked a female co-worker for her phone number and said to another: “Who the f-ck are you? What do you even do here?” When the party ended, the Team Leader accompanied some colleagues to the venue’s public bar, where he spoke crudely to female co-workers, describing one as a “bitch” and kissing another on the mouth, telling her he was going to go home and dream about her.

When the Team Leader returned to work in January, the Company investigated the Team Leader’s conduct and then dismissed him for sexual harassment.

In response, the Team Leader lodged an unfair dismissal claim with the Fair Work Commission. The Commission upheld the claim, finding that only the Team Leader’s conduct during the official work party was relevant. This was primarily because although employees had been informed in advance that the Company’s standards of conduct would apply at the function, there was no suggestion that those standards would apply to behaviour outside of the formal function.

In addition, the Commission found that although the Team Leader’s intimidation and phone number request of a female employee during the party was “boorish”, it was not sexual harassment and not a valid reason for dismissal.

The Commission held that the Team Leader’s conduct in asking a much younger and smaller female colleague during the function “Who the f-ck are you? What do you even do here?” was a valid reason for dismissal. However, since the substance of this allegation had not been put to the Team Leader for a response during the investigation, the Team Leader had not been afforded procedural fairness in the termination process.

In reaching its findings, the Commission also took into account the Team Leader’s “good record of continuous service”, the one-off nature of the conduct, and the fact that his conduct was the result of being intoxicated at the function where there was “unlimited service of free alcohol”.

Tips for employers

This case serves as a timely reminder for employers of the need to take appropriate measures to ensure their annual Christmas party is safe and fun for all.

In particular, before the Christmas function occurs, employers should review their workplace policies in relation to sexual harassment, bullying and discrimination to ensure they are up-to-date, clearly set out the types of behaviour that are unacceptable, and they are expressed apply to the Christmas party and other work related functions.

Once finalised, the policies should be distributed to staff before the function so that they can familiarise themselves with the policies and understand their obligations. It is best practice to also provide training to staff in relation to the policies.

Employers should clearly communicate to staff the start and finish times of the work function. Alcohol should be served responsibly during the function, with food and non-alcoholic drinks also available. Employers should ensure that staff have a safe way to get home after the event.
If any allegations of inappropriate or unlawful behaviour at the function are raised, employers should take the necessary steps to properly investigate the allegations before taking any discipline action, including dismissal. Employers may wish to seek legal advice before taking such action.

About the author

Martin Alden is the Head of Employment & Industrial Relations at Cornwall Stodart, a Melbourne based full service commercial law firm. Martin has significant experience practising in all aspects of employment and industrial relations law. He has worked for a broad range of clients in both the private and public sector.

Free newsletter

Our daily newsletter is FREE and keeps you up-to-date with the world of HR. Please complete the form below and click on subscribe for daily newsletters from HRD Australia.

Recent articles & video

Vocus Group chooses Dayforce to streamline HR processes

5 steps for an effective onboarding process

Does HR have a 'university bias'?

Top 3 recruitment trends for 2020

Most Read Articles

Fun Friday: Weirdest productivity killers at work

Court rules death during sex on a business trip a 'workplace accident'

11 questions to ask your HR team