Brisbane employers cough up $73,000 in back pay

Next breach will be dealt with more severely, watchdog warns

Brisbane employers cough up $73,000 in back pay

Twenty-two young workers were back paid a total of $73,279 by Brisbane businesses as a result of intervention by the Fair Work Ombudsman.

Fair Work Ombudsman Natalie James said that since this was the businesses’ first offenses and they were quick to rectify their errors, they were simply given notice that future breaches of workplace laws will not be tolerated.

  • An open-cut mine supervisor for a Kangaroo Point business was given $40,000 in entitlements following termination of his employment.
The employee was entitled to receive redundancy payments, payment in lieu of notice and annual leave entitlements as prescribed by the Black Coal Mining Industry Award 2010.
  • Twelve waiters and cooks at a Fortitude Valley restaurant, including some visa holders from Colombia, received a total of $24,032 after they were underpaid their minimum hourly rates.
The staff received flat rates of $20 per hour for all hours worked.

Under the Restaurant Industry Award 2010 at the time, they were entitled to receive hourly rates of up to $23.09 for ordinary hours, up to $27.71 on weekends and up to $46.18 on public holidays.

The business has since engaged an accounting and payroll specialist to rectify the errors and put processes in place to ensure future compliance.


  • Nine waiters in Graceville were reimbursed $9,247 after being paid flat rates between $12 and $20 per hour.  Some of the workers were as young as 15 years old.
Under the Restaurant Industry Award 2010, depending on their age, the employees were entitled to receive between $11.83 and $23.64 for ordinary hours and between $14.19 and $28.37 for weekend work.

Fair Work inspectors informed the business that although the flat rates of pay exceeded the rate for ordinary hours, they were not high enough to satisfy all entitlements prescribed by the award.

James said: “In these cases we decided the best outcome was to make sure the workers were repaid quickly and lengthy court proceedings were not necessary.”

“We conduct follow-up audits of businesses previously found to be non-compliant to make sure they have changed their ways. Repeat offenders can expect to face enforcement action including potential litigation and significant court penalties,” she added.


Recent articles & video

Bunnings MD on connection, culture & healthy competition

Tribunal slams employer for firing nurse overweight concerns

KPMG New Zealand offers 18 weeks of paid leave for new parents

Leakers 'don't belong here,' Apple CEO says on leaked memo

Most Read Articles

State shuts down industry “immediately” as anti-vaxxers run riot

Payroll data from ADP reveals 70% of Australians are working for free

'Lazy, entitled, spoilt': Recruiter's WFH rant goes viral