Judge dismisses “opportunistic” work injury case

After receiving $13k worth of support from his employer as a result of an industrial accident, the worker took legal action

A work injury compensation case has been dismissed after the judge found the plaintiff “wholly opportunistic” for using the situation to garner further money from his ex-employer.
In May 2013, Chinese national Wang Baoshun was hit in the eye by a piece of nail he had been hammering while employed by B19 Technologies.
After the incident, he was taken to hospital where he was diagnosed with a slight corneal abrasion and put on seven days of medical leave.
A medical report from the Singapore National Eye Centre reports that the injury healed in a matter of days. Wang then worked for B19 for a further year after the incident.
He later asked his employer to cover the surgical costs to fix the aphakia – a condition when the lens is missing – in his left eye. Despite Wang having this condition for 25 years, B19 paid $9,000 to insert an artificial lens in his eye in May 2014. The firm also paid his monthly salary of $3,000 during this time.
In August, Wang gave notification that he wanted to return to China. B19 bought him a plane ticket and offered him a $1,500 goodwill sum.
A month later, he returned to Singapore to sue B19, claiming he had suffered a “serious” eye injury as a result of the firm’s negligence.
Speaking to The Straits Times, B19 managing director Kang Choon Boon said he felt “betrayed” after giving $13,000 to Wang.
“We treated him with all the kindness and support we could give. We never thought he would turn around and do this,” he said.
While Wang claimed the firm had failed to provide him with safety goggles for use during work, he later admitted when cross-examined that he had simply not worn them that day.
“When we hear of a foreign worker injuring himself as a result of an industrial accident, we are instantly moved to sympathy,” District Judge Chiah Kok Khun wrote in a statement last Monday (4 July).
“However... not every employer of an injured worker is the callous businessman in relentless pursuit of profits, no more than every injured worker is the hapless victim of an employer’s oversight.”
The judge will hear from both parties about settling legal costs at a later date.
Related stories:
MOM drops charges in false WICA claim case
Little finger, big lie: Worker sentenced for false injury claims
Employers must cover foreign worker medical bills, says MOM

Recent articles & video

Singapore hikes qualifying salaries amid foreign-local talent competition: report

Japan warned of losing younger employees to attractive wages overseas: reports

McKinsey & Co. to lay off over 300 employees: reports

Only 24% of employers globally have achieved full gender equality: report

Most Read Articles

MoneySmart's ex-head of tech under fire for new role at rival firm

Novartis to cut over 600 jobs amid global restructuring

Asian firms 'cautious' about implementing pay transparency