HRD forum is the place for positive industry interaction and welcomes your professional and informed opinion.

The $1m employee termination blunder

Notify me of new replies via email
HC Online | 16 Sep 2014, 11:34 AM Agree 0
Length of service and seniority were two important factors in a recent NSW Supreme Court decision, which compelled an employer to part with $900,000.
  • Susan | 16 Sep 2014, 12:12 PM Agree 0
    I believed the NES to be the standard with regards to notice periods or a contract can supersede that if more favourable. As employers how can we determine what's reasonable based on tenure? What should be used as a guideline?
  • QLDHR | 16 Sep 2014, 02:19 PM Agree 0
    How is an employer supposed to determine 'reasonable notice' based on tenure? Even redundancy provisions only allow for 12 weeks after 10 years. Where does it state 10 months as being reasonable for a long standing, executive?
  • caca | 17 Sep 2014, 02:59 PM Agree 0
    I don't understand either, where did the 10 month reasonable notice period come from?
  • HR Consultant | 17 Sep 2014, 03:29 PM Agree 0
    This has gone crazy.
Post a reply