Worker dismissed after relying on union advice

The employee was fired over her work performance

Worker dismissed after relying on union advice

A Campbelltown RSL employee was dismissed after the UWU distributed information which was ‘just plainly wrong’.  

Ms. Fisher was dismissed for her ‘work performance’, after failing to remove her nose and ear piercings and using her mobile phone while working.

Further, her refusal to meet with the Operations Manager was based on UWU advice that she was not obliged to do so without a written request. Fisher was stood down after repeatedly failing to attend this meeting.

Without disclosing details, the Commission considered this situation to be ‘one of the worst cases of management bullying’ ever to be seen, suggesting the Operations Manager undertake additional management training.

The Commission also found that the UWU had given incorrect information to Fisher, resulting in the loss of her job.

Although ultimately finding the termination of Fisher’s employment to be unreasonable, the Commission held that it would be contrary to s. 381 Fair Work Act to require the RSL to compensate Fisher, given the UWU’s error.

Key Takeaways for HR:

  • An employer is not required by the FWC to provide notice in writing when wishing to discuss issues with their staff.
  • Procedural fairness should always be followed when dismissing employees.

Recent articles & video

When does 'consented resignation' become termination?

Be recognised as one of Australia's Innovative HR Teams

Bonza administrators urged to prioritise employees

Truck driver to repay over $70,000 for lying to get compensation payments

Most Read Articles

'On-the-spot' termination: Worker cries unfair dismissal amid personal issues

Worker resigns before long service leave entitlement kicked in: Can he still recover?

Employee or contractor? How employers can prepare for workplace laws coming in August