Employer penalised $257K for 'particularly egregious' conduct

The affected employees included 25 visa holders from various countries

Employer penalised $257K for 'particularly egregious' conduct

A company has been penalised $257,000 after it was found to have underpaid 54 workers at a 24-hour café in Melbourne’s Crown Casino precinct.

The Federal Circuit Court penalised Len Di Pietro $40,000 and Ital One Holdings Pty Ltd a further $217,000 for underpayments at Café Baci at Southbank in 2015 and 2016.

The workers were underpaid a combined $73,347 through its use of flat rates which undercut entitlements including the minimum rates for ordinary hours, overtime rates, casual loadings, and penalty rates for weekend, public holiday, late night and early morning work employees were owed under the Restaurant Industry Award 2010.

Before this incident, three former Café Baci workers took their own actions in the small claims division of the Federal Circuit Court, which resulted in Ital One Holdings being ordered to back-pay the three workers a total of more than $32,000 in 2014 and 2015. The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) had provided assistance to two of the workers.

Ombudsman Sandra Parker said that repeated breaches of the Fair Work Act is unacceptable conduct that will always be met with serious consequences.

“The FWO litigated after previously putting Mr Di Pietro and his company on notice about paying the minimum wage and penalty rates,” said Parker.

“We have no tolerance for an employer that fails to act on our advice, particularly where a court has previously ordered that same employer to back-pay workers.”.

Moreover, Judge Heather Riley said the respondents' conduct was “particularly egregious”.

“[T]he [company] had been found by this court to have broken workplace laws in substantially similar ways on three previous occasions in the recent past.

The respondents have shown no remorse, but sought to minimise their behaviour with complaints of being busy,” Judge Riley said.

“It is incumbent on anyone running a business, no matter how busy it is or how many staff it has, to ascertain the correct rates of pay for employees and have systems in place to ensure that the correct rates of pay are paid.

“In my view, the need for general deterrence is a significant factor in this matter, given the level of disputes in the café and restaurant sector, and the vulnerability of many of the employees in that industry”.

The affected employees included 25 visa holders from various countries including France, Italy and India who were mainly on student and 417 working holiday visas. One visa holder was aged just 19 at the time of the underpayments.

The café operated 24 hours a day, seven days per week, with the underpaid workers engaged as waiters, kitchen hands, chefs and in other roles. The largest individual underpayment was $5433 for a food and beverage attendant between June and September 2016.

“All workers in Australia have the same rights at work, regardless of citizenship, and we will continue to take businesses who underpay migrant workers to court,” said Parker.

“We have an agreement with the Department of Home Affairs where visa holders can contact us for help without fear of their visa being cancelled.”

The company was also ordered to engage an external professional to audit the business’s compliance with workplace laws.

With the parties’ consent, her Honour also ordered Di Pietro and other relevant managerial staff to undertake workplace relations training.

Related stories

Free newsletter

Our daily newsletter is FREE and keeps you up-to-date with the world of HR. Please complete the form below and click on subscribe for daily newsletters from HRD Australia.

Recent articles & video

IBM think they can predict your employees’ departure. Eight things you should do next

How to offer a stellar employee recognition program

Five biggest drivers of workplace stress – and how to fight them

Robots at work will give rise to ‘super jobs’

Most Read Articles

How to handle a toxic boss

Is your organization making this killer diversity mistake?

Amazon CEO challenges rivals to match their employee benefits