Bullying claim payout a timely reminder

As the Supreme Court orders a significant payout to a bullying victim, legislative changes to the Fair Work Act regarding bullying in the workplace are a timely reminder for all employers to review their policies and procedures.

The changes to the Fair Work Act (FWA) introduced to crack down on bullying in the workplace have now been passed by parliament. However, the start date has been moved from 1 July 2013 to 1 January 2014, Marque Lawyers reported.

The extra six months will allow the Fair Work Commission (FWC) more time to prepare for the influx of submissions they are likely to receive when the changes come into play. It also gives organisations a generous warning to ensure their workplace is not fostering a culture of bullying.

The need for tighter regulation of bullying in some organisations becomes apparent in cases such as last month’s ruling on a sales assistant being violently abused by her boss over the course of five years.

Wendy Swan, a sales assistant at Legibook, began making complaints about the hostility, rudeness and often violent behaviour of her boss, Kriston Cowell, as early as 2003, The Herald Sun reported.

With no action taken to stop the harassment, a formal complaint was made by Swan in 2005, which also saw no resolution. She left Legibook in 2007, and hasn’t worked since.

A civil action hearing by the Supreme Court has awarded Swan close to $600,000, finding she is unlikely to work again, and has developed anxiety and depression due to her treatment.

The failure of Swan’s employer to ensure her safety at work resulted in the hefty pay-out, and with these FWA changes now six months away, organisations should review their own anti-bullying initiatives to ensure the safety and wellbeing of all workers.

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                             

Recent articles & video

Manager's email shows employer's true intention in dismissal dispute

Employer or contractor: Court determines liability in workplace accident

Women's rights group criticizes discount retailer for not signing safety accord

U.S. bans non-compete agreements

Most Read Articles

Manager tells worker: 'Just leave, I don't want you here' during heated exchange

Worker put on forced annual leave amid employer's legal dispute with landlord

Why human skills are critical in the era of AI