Is soft power better than aggressive leadership?

The international relations concept of ‘soft power’ provides valuable lessons for boardroom politics

Is soft power better than aggressive leadership?
The concept of ‘soft power’ is usually used in politics to describe a leader who attracts and co-opts their followers’ support rather than coercing them or giving them money. Coined by Joseph Nye of Harvard University in 1990, the concept is also applicable in the boardroom.
Applying the practice of soft power in the way you lead means that you are able to build better networks and have a more satisfied workforce because you are opening up the communication lines between yourself and your colleagues and subordinates.
Rather than simply telling executive colleagues what to do, you are asking them to be part of the process, thus acknowledging their importance in the executive team. This is especially critical for HR directors, who don’t have formal authority over their boardroom colleagues and are often newcomers to the c-suite.
Dilys Boey, Asean People Advisory Services Leader, Ernst & Young Advisory previously spoke to HRD about the importance of persuasion, role-modeling, and soft power in leadership.
“Leadership plays a vital part in role-modeling the acceptable behaviours, actions and decision-making behaviour to shape the ethical culture of organisations,” said Boey.

Free newsletter

Our daily newsletter is FREE and keeps you up-to-date with the world of HR. Please complete the form below and click on subscribe for daily newsletters from HRD Asia.

Recent articles & video

Creating conditions in which organisational development thrives

Jack Ma on '996' overtime culture

How to offer a stellar employee recognition program

Hong Kong Airlines faces mass employee exodus

Most Read Articles

Jet Airways pilots grounded due to unpaid salaries

Is your organization making this killer diversity mistake?

'It starts with people and it ends with people'