New findings challenge the assumption that the best way to improve gender equality is to encourage women to become more assertive
As International Women’s Day this year presses for progress in gender equality, a new RMIT University study suggests that a “personality gender gap” impacts women’s progress at work.
The research also concludes that confidence helps men get ahead but makes a small amount of difference for women.
Indeed, it suggests that while having a confident personality boosts men’s chances of job promotion by 3.3%, women gain no sizeable benefit.
An estimated 150,000 more men than women are promoted each year within Australia’s 12 million-strong workforce.
The study is the largest of its kind in Australia, examining the promotion prospects and confidence levels of more than 7500 working men and women across Australia.
Economic researcher Dr Leonora Risse said the findings challenge the prevailing assumption that the best way to improve gender equality in the workplace is to encourage women to become more assertive.
This suggests that popular approaches like the “lean in” movement championed by Facebook executive Sheryl Sandberg could be misguided.
“Confidence is a factor in success at work, and we see that, on average, women are less confident than men in putting themselves forward for a challenge,” said Risse.
“So it seems logical that, to achieve gender equality, we should encourage women to ‘lean in’ and develop the confidence to go for more challenging roles and job promotions.
“But our analysis shows it’s not that simple. Greater confidence does not translate into career gains, on the whole, for women.
“In fact, there is a risk that placing the onus on women to change their behaviour deflects attention from the bigger issue, which is the gender bias that appears to simmer beneath the surface in many organisational environments.
“Rather than pushing for behavioural change among women, workplaces should instead check for gender biases in how they value their workers’ attributes to ensure they don’t reward charisma over competence.”
The study measured confidence using a psychological survey instrument that contains two dimensions – hope for success and fear of failure. Workers with higher confidence, or hope for success, were generally more likely to be promoted in the following year.
On average, men have a higher hope for success, while women have a higher fear of failure.
The catch is that among men, progressive increases in hope for success lift their job promotion prospects – by 3.3% on average. But increases in hope for success don’t translate to any sizeable increase in the promotion prospects of women.
The gender disparity is starkly revealed when comparing a man and a woman at the upper-most end of the confidence scale: your chances of promotion rise from 8 per cent to 14% if you’re a highly confident man, but remain at around 7 to 8 per cent if you’re a highly confident woman.
“This signal of potential bias in how women are treated in the workplace is consistent with other research showing that women receive a lower benefit – or even suffer backlash – for demonstrating ambition, confidence, assertiveness and leadership qualities in the workplace,” Risse said.
“Higher confidence does not necessarily equate to higher competence. In fact, overconfidence can lead to poor performance.
“Instead of encouraging women to converge to a stereotypical image of a successful leader, workplaces should focus on the gains that diversity in workers’ personalities and attributes brings to their organisation.”