A collapsed business sale left her jobless - then the Commission ruled on who ended the employment
An early test of the new casual-conversion rules just reset how HR should handle these notices
A direct instruction to read one short policy went ignored - and it decided the case
A team merger did not gut her role, the Commission found - her contract already let it change
A checklist existed, the hazard was visible, and the employer still shared the blame
Vows of obedience, a weekly stipend, JobKeeper - but the commission still found no employment
A terminal diagnosis wasn't the deciding factor - an overlooked entitlement was
All three of his complaints counted as protected - so how did the employer still answer the claim
She argued her dismissal took effect the next business day. The Commission read the letter differently
Savills knew the substance of the claims since 2019 - the court drew a clear line on delay
