AFFCO explains Employment Court appeal

The meat processor claims the decision goes against 30 years of “well established” law in New Zealand.

AFFCO explains Employment Court appeal
href="/nz/companies/affco/148828">AFFCO New Zealand has spoken out about a recent Employment Court decision that didn’t go in the company’s favour, claiming it contradicts decades of well-established law within New Zealand.

The case addressed the issue of whether seasonal plant work amounted to continuous employment or, as AFFCO argued, discontinuous employment with off-season workers classed as unemployed.

Eventually the meat processor was found to have unlawfully locked out workers when collective bargaining talks were still under way but the Talley’s-operated organization is appealing. 

“Despite 30 years of well-established law in New Zealand providing that seasonal workers are not employees in the off-season, the Employment Court overturned such established law and determined that employment is continuous,” a company representative told HRM.

“Given that the Employment Court’s decision goes against over 30 years of well-established law in New Zealand, and has serious consequences for the entire seasonal workforce in New Zealand, the judgment is under appeal,” he added.

More like this:

When can HR legally ask for a sick note?

Transgender worker claims constructive dismissal

Three must-have skills HR should borrow from marketing
 

Recent articles & video

'More people are leaving their jobs than at any point in history'

Can you measure HR's impact on employee experience?

Jack Dorsey steps down as Twitter CEO

What makes an HR hero? Award winners reveal secrets

Most Read Articles

'No jab, no job': Supreme Court rejects request to rule on policy directly

The Great Resignation: What are candidates looking for?

Supermarket distribution workers walk off the job over pay