Company faces court after ignoring FWC order

In a landmark case, a Melbourne gym is facing legal action in the Federal Circuit Court after ignoring a Fair Work Commission order to pay compensation to an unfairly dismissed employee.

Employers who choose to ignore Fair Work Commission rulings may find themselves facing court, as one Melbourne company discovered.

In January, World Gym Sunshine was ordered to pay $2,200 in compensation to a 24-year-old receptionist that it was found to have unfairly dismissed, within 14 days.

When the company failed to pay up, the employee contacted the Fair Work Ombudsman, who issued several notices requesting payment.

These were allegedly ignored and the company now faces legal action, along with Wayne Mailing, its director and part-owner.

The gym faces a maximum penalty of $51,000, while Mailing could face up to $10,200.

Employment lawyer Peter Vitale told SmartCompany that it could be the first time an industrial relations case has reached the Federal Circuit Court since the current Fair Work Commission was introduced.

“The case is unusual in that when the Fair Work Commission makes an order, the vast majority of employers apply them,” Vitale was quoted as saying.

“Since 1956, the mechanism has always been that if an employer or employee ignored a ruling of the industrial relations tribunal, then it could only be enforced through a federal court. So this is an unusual example of the need to take action in the federal court to enforce a decision. Most people, whether they’re employers, employees or unions, will comply.”

Recent articles & video

Manager's email shows employer's true intention in dismissal dispute

Employer or contractor: Court determines liability in workplace accident

Women's rights group criticizes discount retailer for not signing safety accord

U.S. bans non-compete agreements

Most Read Articles

Manager tells worker: 'Just leave, I don't want you here' during heated exchange

How to avoid taking adverse action against an employee

Worker put on forced annual leave amid employer's legal dispute with landlord