Breaking: Unions lose in fresh Supreme Court decision

Mandatory union dues in the public sector have been slammed in a 5-4 ruling released just this morning

Breaking: Unions lose in fresh Supreme Court decision
A 5-4 decision in the Supreme Court this morning found in favor of Illinois home-care providers who challenged their mandatory union dues.

The Harris v. Quinn case came close to overturning Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, which allowed public sector unions to impose fees on non-members. It was the same precedent that allowed the Illinois regulatory scheme requiring the workers in question to pay union fees in the first place.
 
You might also like: Did these companies go too far to discourage unionization?

In 1977, Abood found public employees could be required to pay union fees even if they weren’t a member, as long as they did not have to pay any portion of fees that covers political activity.

However, here the court drew a distinction between “full-fledged public employees” and “partial public” ones, saying the health workers in this case were merely partial public. The employees in question were not directly employed by the government, but instead were reimbursed through Illinois’ Medicaid program.
 
You might also like: Hundreds of NLRB decisions could be invalid

Free newsletter

Our daily newsletter is FREE and keeps you up-to-date with the world of HR. Please complete the form below and click on subscribe for daily newsletters from HRD America.

Recent articles & video

The benefits and pitfalls of a 'four-day work week'

HRD launches game-changing website redesign

What is the secret to a killer recruitment strategy?

How to foster a digital workplace culture

Most Read Articles

HRD launches game-changing website redesign

The benefits and pitfalls of a 'four-day work week'