Breaking: Unions lose in fresh Supreme Court decision

Mandatory union dues in the public sector have been slammed in a 5-4 ruling released just this morning

Breaking: Unions lose in fresh Supreme Court decision

A 5-4 decision in the Supreme Court this morning found in favor of Illinois home-care providers who challenged their mandatory union dues.

The Harris v. Quinn case came close to overturning Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, which allowed public sector unions to impose fees on non-members. It was the same precedent that allowed the Illinois regulatory scheme requiring the workers in question to pay union fees in the first place.
 

You might also like: Did these companies go too far to discourage unionization?


In 1977, Abood found public employees could be required to pay union fees even if they weren’t a member, as long as they did not have to pay any portion of fees that covers political activity.

However, here the court drew a distinction between “full-fledged public employees” and “partial public” ones, saying the health workers in this case were merely partial public. The employees in question were not directly employed by the government, but instead were reimbursed through Illinois’ Medicaid program.
 

You might also like: Hundreds of NLRB decisions could be invalid

Recent articles & video

Arianna Huffington: Why HR is the most important leader in the C-suite

How to evaluate your people in a pandemic and beyond

Female-led dating app Bumble plans to go public

Fun Friday: The most brilliant LinkedIn profiles

Most Read Articles

'I will fire you on the spot': Biden's warning for staff

How Biden's presidency will impact HR and talent mobility

Arianna Huffington: Why HR is the most important leader in the C-suite