Breaking: Unions lose in fresh Supreme Court decision

Mandatory union dues in the public sector have been slammed in a 5-4 ruling released just this morning

Breaking: Unions lose in fresh Supreme Court decision

A 5-4 decision in the Supreme Court this morning found in favor of Illinois home-care providers who challenged their mandatory union dues.

The Harris v. Quinn case came close to overturning Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, which allowed public sector unions to impose fees on non-members. It was the same precedent that allowed the Illinois regulatory scheme requiring the workers in question to pay union fees in the first place.
 

You might also like: Did these companies go too far to discourage unionization?


In 1977, Abood found public employees could be required to pay union fees even if they weren’t a member, as long as they did not have to pay any portion of fees that covers political activity.

However, here the court drew a distinction between “full-fledged public employees” and “partial public” ones, saying the health workers in this case were merely partial public. The employees in question were not directly employed by the government, but instead were reimbursed through Illinois’ Medicaid program.
 

You might also like: Hundreds of NLRB decisions could be invalid

Recent articles & video

Workplace legislations set to rock California employers in 2022

These 10 well-known companies offer fully remote or hybrid work arrangements

Half of unvaccinated California state workers not being tested, says report

Top cities for tech workers revealed

Most Read Articles

Can an employer revoke a job offer?

Workplace legislations set to rock California employers in 2022

Half of unvaccinated California state workers not being tested, says report