Put the FitBit down: why you shouldn’t use wearables to monitor employees’ health

Wearable technology is a growing trend, and one many employers are considering introducing, but Suzanne Lucas - better known as the Evil HR Lady - says it's a step too far

Put the FitBit down: why you shouldn’t use wearables to monitor employees’ health
I w
ear a FitBit and compete with my friends for the most number of steps each week. But, it’s only a friendly competition and meant only to encourage us to be a bit healthier. But what if it wasn’t friends encouraging friends, but your boss? And the reward wasn’t the satisfaction of knowing you walked 10,000 more steps than Karen and Eleanora, but that your health insurance premiums were lower?

No one wants to pay more for health insurance premiums, but is using wearable devices to monitor your employees’ health really a good option?

Some companies think so. Forbes reports that petroleum giant BP uses FitBit data to grant discounts on health insurance rates. And we’ve reported on companies like Global Corporate Challenge that will help you set up competitions among employees to encourage their overall “wellness.”

Some people love it. Especially those who get to shell out less cash for health insurance. But, there is a dark side to the collection and use of all this data. Here’s why you should reconsider (literally) tracking your employees every step: evilhrlady.org.

Recent articles & video

California nightclub owner accused of allowing employees to consume alcohol, cannabis

Slack CEO to step down

HR veteran to retire after more than 40 years

Patient’s widow claims medical corporation liable for employees’ conduct

Most Read Articles

Does your benefits package include an employee discounts program?

Furniture company fires 2,700 workers just before Thanksgiving

Four ways to improve recruiting and retention