Employers at greater risk following CBC scandal

High-profile harassment cases have educated employees on their rights and put HR pros at greater risk, warns one labour lawyer.

Employers at greater risk following CBC scandal
h profile harassment suits dominated the headlines last year and one labour lawyer says the media coverage has made workers more aware of their rights. Now, she says HR managers must be extra vigilant to avoid risk.

“Obligation to investigate allegations of harassment has existed for several years but the CBC case brought it front and centre,” says Norton Rose Fulbright lawyer, Sarah Crossley.

“Employees are becoming more knowledgeable about their rights and the expectation for employers to understand the law and to conduct a proper investigation has reached a higher level,” she continued.

Empowering employees

We’ve already seen first-hand how the media coverage empowered employees – just weeks after the Jian Ghomeshi story surfaced, one woman spoke out about her experience as an intern on Parliament Hill.

The woman, who chose to remain anonymous, said the CBC saga had inspired her to come forward and make a renewed complaint.

“As more and more cases are reported, employees become more aware of the obligation employers have to fully investigate complaints and harassment,” says Crossley.

“Over the last year, there were several different cases from Canadian courts, human rights tribunals and arbitrators – all of which are signalling to employers that you can’t turn a blind eye to these sorts of accusations.”

Investigating allegations 

Of course most employers wouldn’t intentionally ignore a serious allegation of harassment but Crossley says even organizations with the best intentions could be putting themselves at risk if they’re not adequately equipped to handle an investigation. 

“It’s important that employers treat all complaints seriously and if they decide to investigate, it needs to be effective and fair,” Crossley told HRM.

“If you fail to investigate, if you do a shoddy job or if you don’t get the right people to do it, then there is a significant risk from a financial liability perspective but there’s also a reputational risk to employers,” she continued.

Crossley says whoever is tasked with investigating should have some formal training as well as all the necessary tools for the job. She added that they don’t always have to be hired externally but internal investigators can pose a number of problems.

“You might not want someone internal handling a very senior person within the organization or a very high profile person within the organization,” explained Crossley. “It can be difficult for someone internal to do an investigation if there’s a power imbalance.”

Crossley also added that an investigation could lose credibility if it was carried out by someone who had had any past dealings with the employees involved. 

“What’s really important – whether they’re internal or external – is that you have someone who understands how to conduct a full and fair investigation,” she said. “Because at the end of the day, and at the end of the investigation, some important decisions will have to be made.”

Sarah Crossley will be offering expert advice about emerging risks for the year in a special HR Masterclass hosted in April. You can find out more about the seminar here.  

Recent articles & video

HR veteran to retire after more than 40 years

Patient’s widow claims medical corporation liable for employees’ conduct

More than half of employees open to job hunting in the next year

Investing in employee learning and development

Most Read Articles

Does your benefits package include an employee discounts program?

Furniture company fires 2,700 workers just before Thanksgiving

32% of Americans admit to lying on their resume