New U.S. tariff proposal takes aim at forced labor goods from 60 countries

The U.S. is proposing new tariffs on imports from 60 economies — and Canada is among those in the crosshairs

New U.S. tariff proposal takes aim at forced labor goods from 60 countries

The U.S. is moving to impose new tariffs on dozens of trading partners, including Canada, over failures to ban or enforce restrictions on forced labor in supply chains, with direct implications for American employers and importers.

The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) has proposed additional duties on imports from 60 economies after determining all have failed to impose or enforce bans on forced labor goods. Canada is among a small group of jurisdictions, alongside the European Union and Mexico, identified as having legal prohibitions on paper but failing to enforce them effectively.

In response, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has pledged new legislation to strengthen Canada's framework, telling reporters in Ottawa that his government does not want "any element of forced labor coming in goods and services."

U.S. proposes tiered tariff regime

The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) has proposed additional duties on imports from 60 economies after determining all have failed to impose or enforce bans on forced labor goods.

The agency concluded the gaps distort market conditions and disadvantage companies that comply with labor standards.

Under the plan, economies that have implemented or committed to enforcing prohibitions through Agreements on Reciprocal Trade would face a 10% tariff. Those without such measures would face a higher 12.5% duty. A separate textile mechanism would allow limited volumes of apparel imports at reduced tariff rates, reflecting supply chain complexities in that sector.

Public consultations are underway, with written submissions due by July 6, 2026, and hearings scheduled for July 7.

Canada cited despite CUSMA commitments

Canada is among a small group of jurisdictions — along with the European Union and Mexico — identified as having legal prohibitions on forced labor imports but failing to enforce them effectively.

The USTR report points to commitments under the Canada–U.S.–Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) as evidence of progress, stating that such frameworks “reflect the increasing awareness of this issue.”

However, it adds: “each of our trading partners must do more to ensure that trade does not perversely encourage and entrench forced labor globally.”

Labor market pressures add urgency

The tariff proposal lands amid ongoing strain in Canada's labor market, amplifying concerns for U.S. employers and importers with exposure to trade-sensitive industries.

Canada's private sector shed about 112,000 jobs in the first four months of 2026, with an additional 8,700 public sector roles lost, according to Statistics Canada. Job losses have been concentrated in export-oriented industries such as mining, primary metals and forestry. Forestry and logging employment, for example, declined four per cent year-to-date through 2025, continuing a multi-year downward trend.

The Bank of Canada has described current conditions as "low hire, low fire," with persistently weak hiring limiting workforce renewal and mobility.

Trade uncertainty deepens for North American supply chains

The proposed tariffs add to broader uncertainty as Canada navigates ongoing CUSMA review discussions and sector-specific trade negotiations.

Canada has formally called for a 16-year renewal of CUSMA, as trade uncertainty continues to drive workforce instability across the country. Canadian officials have signaled openness to proposals that support long-term North American competitiveness, while also engaging in talks covering steel, aluminum, automobiles and forestry — sectors most exposed to tariff changes. Prime Minister Carney said June 2 that the U.S. has identified roughly 30 technical issues with Canada, as Ottawa explores ways to reduce tariff impacts.

Meanwhile, the U.S. has already adjusted some trade measures, lowering tariffs on certain steel and aluminum products from 25% to 15%, with further reductions possible under domestic sourcing thresholds.

The United States and Mexico have also begun formal discussions, indicating potential for broader realignment of trade rules.

Growing implications for employers

USTR's findings reinforce the connection between labor practices and trade competitiveness, with direct implications for American businesses sourcing goods across borders.

The agency said failure to restrict forced labor imports allows some firms to produce goods at lower cost, "thereby distort[ing] market conditions" and disadvantaging compliant businesses.

Here are the tariffs the U.S. has imposed on other countries that are in place today, according to the report titled US Reciprocal Tariffs by Country: Complete 2026 by HS Rates

Country / Region

Announced IEEPA rate

Rate actually in effect

Status as of June 2026

Canada

25% (fentanyl)

0% for USMCA goods

Separate IEEPA fentanyl order; USMCA-compliant goods exempt

Mexico

25% (fentanyl)

0% for USMCA goods

Separate IEEPA fentanyl order; USMCA-compliant goods exempt 

China

145% peak

10% (Geneva truce)

Reduced to 10% via Geneva truce; extended to Nov 10, 2026. IEEPA struck down; Section 301 (7.5%–100%) and Section 232 (50%) remain. 

European Union

20%

10% (paused)

IEEPA void; now 10% Section 122 + MFN

Japan

24%

10% (paused)

IEEPA void; bilateral talks were active

South Korea

25%

10% (paused)

IEEPA void; auto framework discussed

India

26%

10% (paused)

IEEPA void; also had a 25% "Russian oil" surcharge removed Feb 7, 2026

Vietnam

46%

10% (paused)

Highest non-China rate; reflected a large trade surplus, not Vietnam's own tariffs 

Taiwan

32%

10% (paused)

IEEPA void; semiconductor/defence talks

Thailand

36%

10% (paused)

IEEPA void

Indonesia

32%

10% (paused)

IEEPA void

Switzerland

31%

10% (paused)

IEEPA void

Cambodia

49%

10% (paused)

IEEPA void

Lesotho

50%

10% (paused)

Highest rate outside China 

United Kingdom

10%

10%

Baseline; bilateral framework announced May 8, 2025

Baseline (Brazil, Argentina, Australia, etc.)

10%

10%

Baseline rate, no pause needed

Canada's response to the U.S. tariffs has run along several tracks at once: retaliatory counter-tariffs (most later rolled back), financial and remission relief for business, a large workforce/labour-market support effort, and an ongoing negotiation posture. Here's the data organized by track. 

Response track

What Canada did

Key data / figures

Source

Counter-tariffs (initial)

Imposed 25% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods

25% on ~C$30B of U.S. goods effective March 4, 2025, expanding toward 25% on roughly C$155B of goods

Prime Minister of Canada; Canadian HR Reporter

Counter-tariffs (rollback)

Removed counter-tariffs on CUSMA-compliant U.S. goods; kept steel/aluminum/auto measures

Effective Sept 1, 2025, retaliatory tariffs no longer applied to CUSMA-compliant U.S. goods; non-CUSMA goods raised to 35%; steel, aluminum and auto-parts tariffs retained; ~C$44B in retaliatory tariffs eliminated in 2025

Torys LLP; The Fulcrum

Price impact of counter-tariffs

(Measured effect, not a policy)

By mid-June 2025 tariffed-product prices were ~6% above a control group — about one-quarter pass-through of the 25% counter-tariff; prices fell back quickly after removal on Sept 1 

Bank of Canada research

Business/financial relief

Remission process, duty relief and drawback, liquidity measures

United States Surtax Remission Order (2025) gave time-limited relief from March 4 to Oct 15, 2025; Duties Relief and Duty Drawback programs available 

Department of Finance Canada

Workforce support (federal)

Workforce Tariff Response retraining fund

C$570M over three years to help up to 66,000 workers — C$70M for steel, C$50M for softwood lumber, C$450M for tariff-affected workers generally 

Employment and Social Development Canada

Work-Sharing / EI

Expanded Work-Sharing and extended EI flexibilities

As of March 14, 2026, ~1,500 Work-Sharing applications approved, covering 54,000+ workers and preventing an estimated 20,000 layoffs; flexibilities extended to March 31, 2027; Worker Retention Grant announced by PM Carney in November 2025 

Canadian HR Reporter

Workforce support (provincial)

Joint federal-provincial retraining programs

Canada-Ontario: C$228.8M to train ~27,000 workers; Canada-B.C.: C$70.4M; Canada-Alberta: C$68.5M for 7,800+ workers (announced May 12, 2026) 

HRD Canada (Human Resources Director)

Employer-level response

Layoffs, work-sharing, contingency planning

Around half of Canadian employers expected to cut production or lay off workers; Stellantis temporarily laid off ~4,500; Sheertex cut 40% of staff; KPMG survey: 50% expected headcount to fall over the year, 76% undertook a strategic review 

Canadian HR Reporter (citing KPMG)

Small-business strain

(Measured effect)

Nearly one in five (19%) small businesses facing tariff costs said they would not survive more than six months under current conditions 

HRD Canada (citing CFIB)

Sectoral labour impact

(Measured effect)

Damage concentrated in a small set of tariff-exposed industries, with auto, metals and forestry workforces under the greatest strain 

HRD Canada (citing RBC Economics)

LATEST NEWS