Regional development key factor in FIFO debate
05/09/2011
|
1
comments
.jpg)
Stronger policy decisions to support and co-ordinate regional development could ease community concerns around 'fly-in, fly-out' (FIFO) workforces, according to resource industry employer group AMMA.
AMMA is calling for enhanced incentives to localise workforces in regional towns, but has welcomed the Queensland government's acknowledgement that FIFO arrangements are an ongoing reality in the resource industry.
As the Federal Government launches its inquiry into the use of FIFO practices, AMMA director Minna Knight said the resources sector has contributed to development in regional areas where there are existing mining operations.
"The reality is the sector is facing a critical labour shortage and using a FIFO workforce is often the only viable way to fulfil employment needs," said Knight.
"Many of the rural towns across Queensland and Australia involved in this debate were historically built off the back of previous mining booms and that correlation with regional development is something the resource industry is proud of, and remains committed to.
"But with limited schooling and child-care options, sub-standard roads and minimal infrastructure in some regional areas, it's understandable the majority of workers in the industry are reluctant to relocate their families when FIFO options exist.
"The incentives are often not there for permanent residency and it's important for all levels of government to review existing services and infrastructure where communities wish to entice workers to live in a particular area.
"Appropriate government funding must be allocated for regional development to sustain future population increases driven by resources projects."
In addition to infrastructure development, tax incentives for workers taking residency in regional mining areas is another possible initiative that could strike a more favourable balance between FIFO and local workers.
AMMA (the Australian Mines and Metals Association) will submit key information to the Standing Committee On Regional Australia's inquiry into the use of FIFO on behalf of its extensive membership base.
"Sensible policy-making is crucial for the future of FIFO workplace practices and its role in easing the critical skills shortage in the resource industry," said Knight.
Lastest news
Most popular
Latest Comments
Total:
1
comment(s)
Sharon Dwyer on
11 Sep 2011 03:06 PM
It is a reality that not all mine workers will be FIFO at any mine. Local workers will always have an important role to play. The mining companies are looking for the option to increase FIFO numbers because of the disparity between mine development and surrounding rural town development.
Instead of waiting for any government to step up to the plate and develop regional communities by providing adequate schools, childcare, health facilities and safer roads (just to name a few substandard services outside cities) why don't the mining giants consider negotiating tax breaks for providing these services themselves? This proactive stance has been taken previously in towns like Lightning Ridge and will solve the impasse between mines and government who all want to be seen as protecting jobs and local lifestyles in a reasonable time frame. If it is left to the Government we will never see more than focus groups and studies in our lifetime. The issue of individual and community health is too important to keep passing the buck.