Fast-food chain to pay $720k in discrimination case

A former employee of the restaurant chain alleged that she was fired unfairly due to her pregnancy

Burrito-chain Chipotle Mexican Grill, which has branches in the USA, UK and Canada, has been ordered to pay US$550k (AU$720k) in damages to a former employee after a court ruled that the employee’s manager discriminated against her for being pregnant.

Doris Garcia Hernandez, who worked in a US branch of the restaurant in Washington DC, alleged that she was harassed and ultimately fired by her former manager after she became pregnant, New York Post reported.

Hernandez, who worked at the store between 2011 and 2012, said that her manager – referred to only as “David” – restricted her toilet breaks, harassed her publicly for ‘taking too long’, and denied her access to water during shifts.

The suit alleged: “Upon learning of her pregnancy, David told Ms Garcia that she had to announce to every employee in the store when she was going to the bathroom and that David would have to approve her bathroom breaks so that he could cover her work position for her,” The Washington Business Journal reported.

The manager did not impose the same requirements on non-pregnant employees.

Hernandez said she was then fired after leaving work early to attend a doctor’s appointment, after her request to do so was denied numerous times.

She said the manager fired her the next day in front of other employees, according to the suit.

The court ruled that Hernandez’s former manager did terminate her due to her pregnancy, and awarded the former employee compensatory and punitive damages.
 
 

 

Recent articles & video

Australia's paid parental leave to reach 26 weeks by 2026

IT contractor gets 2.5-year jail time for swindling

Can 'provocation' be used as a defence in a workplace altercation?

Should an employer's religious views influence a dismissal decision?

Most Read Articles

Teacher sends 'Goodbye' message on WhatsApp group: Did she resign?

'Frustrated' worker blames 'understaffing' for aggressive behaviour

Co-managers challenge improper consultation process amid redundancy