Candidates wise up to washing their Facebook page

A new online application helps people find red flags on their social media pages, starting with Facebook, but is it a bad thing for HR?

Most recruiters at least Google a candidate, but many are also checking social media pages including Facebook, Twitter and blogs. But the free reign HR has had may be coming to an end as candidates wise up to ways they can 'clean' their online presence.

A new application for Facebook called SimpleWash alerts users to red flags on their profiles. From swear words to references to alcohol and drugs, the program prompts users to think about what employers might be looking for.

“The internet never forgets,” the app’s homepage says. “You just lived your life and did your thing – and now, you've got the posts and pics to show it. But do you have the time and energy and robotic perfection to hunt down all those little details?”

By allowing access to their page, users get a list of posts that might be considered questionable to a professional image. Words like “beer”, “drunk” and “smoke” all get flagged, as well as swearing and other obscenities. The system is not perfect – (this reporter’s post about Russian protest group Pussy Riot was flagged) – but it offers young people entering the job market a chance to put on a professional front as they start job hunting.

So far 120,000 people have checked their profiles, and the program will launch for Twitter soon.

Last year, employment lawyer Stuart Rudner told HRM it would be “negligent” of recruiters to ignore social media and the information they could gain from checking profiles and feeds. However, there were legal complications around discovering information that could lead to accusations of discrimination.

Even if the HR person had appropriate reasons for not hiring that person, the candidate could still accuse the hirer of making that decision based on knowledge of age, illness or background, Rudner says. Having another person do the research and prepare a report of only relevant information meant the company could prove that the decision maker did not have the details in question.

Recent articles & video

Sydney mall reopens with caution and care after tragic stabbing incident

4 in 10 Aussies checking work emails while on leave: survey

Australia's HR leaders investing more in AI – despite concerns: report

Worker claims unfair dismissal after swapping permanent role for time-limited position

Most Read Articles

WA introduces changes to long service leave regulations for local government workers

Employers express concern about doubling annual leave, at half pay

Worker resigns over frustration amid workplace investigation