What vegetable would you be? Why are manholes round? Teach me something I don’t know. There are all kinds of tactics for getting to the heart of your candidates knowledge, creativity and problem solving skills, but is asking something that open-ended and high-pressure, especially in an interview setting, really useful?
Financial Times columnist Lucy Kellaway says no – it just causes stress and confusion. The question was asked at the Hay Festival and a panel of writers struggled, with one saying they didn’t know anything other people didn’t know and whatever he used to know he’d forgotten.
“Listening to this, I changed my mind,” Kellaway said. “Mr. Page’s question isn’t great at all. It is as hopeless as all the other things people ask applicants.”
The theory goes that by asking a question the applicant isn’t prepared for, the answer will carry more meaning compared to things like “Tell me about a time you showed courage.”
Kellaway lists some of the oddball offerings collected by Glassdoor.com, including these gems:
If you were shrunk to the size of a pencil and put in a blender how would you get out? (Goldman Sachs)
What do you think of garden gnomes? (Trader Joe’s)
If you were a Microsoft Office program, which would it be? (an unnamed auto repair shop)
As fun as these might be to ask – especially if you enjoy making interviewees sweat – studies show the results are little better than picking people at random.
The question “What is 37 times 37?” might show some useful information about a candidate, Kellowar added, but she suggested interviewers ditch the off-the-wall approach if they want to get more than a look of terror from candidates.
Morbidly obese man wins job back
Shift workers at risk, duty of care under the spotlight
Make your job advertisements go viral
Reduce staff turnover by 80%? Easy.
Ten ways to improve your hiring success
A third of execs think of quitting in their first 3 months